In today’s hyper-competitive business environment, expanding globally is no longer a luxury—it’s a necessity. And building offshore teams has become a proven strategy to drive growth, access top-tier talent, and operate at scale.
However, choosing how to build your offshore team can be challenging. There are several models available—each with its strengths and limitations. Making the wrong choice could mean sunk costs, inconsistent quality, and operational chaos.
This blog breaks down the five main offshore team-building models, complete with real-world brand examples and a deep dive into why Global Capability Centers (GCCs) in India are emerging as the go-to model for global companies.
Options to Build Offshore teams
Traditional Outsourcing
Outsourcing is the practice of contracting a third-party vendor to handle specific business functions. Commonly outsourced tasks include software development, customer support, data entry, and QA.
Pros:
- Quick setup and onboarding.
- No need to manage recruitment or infrastructure.
- Scales up and down based on need.
Cons:
- Minimal control over team and output.
- Quality can vary depending on the vendor.
- High vendor dependency and potential data/IP risk.
Example:
Companies like General Electric and IBM pioneered outsourcing in the early 2000s, offloading call center and IT work to vendors in India and the Philippines. While this helped reduce costs, it often led to challenges in quality, control, and customer experience over time .
Best For:
Short-term or non-core tasks where speed and cost-efficiency matter more than ownership.
Freelancers and Gig Platforms
This model involves hiring independent professionals for specific tasks through platforms like Upwork, Fiverr, or Toptal.
Pros:
- Flexible and fast hiring.
- Cost-effective for small jobs.
- Access to niche skill sets.
Cons:
- No long-term commitment or loyalty.
- Difficult to maintain quality or continuity.
- Not scalable for building full teams or core operations.
Example:
Startups like Buffer and Automattic have used freelancers for content, design, and prototyping. However, they transitioned to in-house and remote teams for long-term scalability and consistency.
Best For:
One-off projects like design, content writing, or prototype development.
Offshore Development Centers (ODCs)
An ODC is a dedicated development team in an offshore location, managed by a third-party provider but fully aligned with your workflows and tech stack.
Pros:
- Greater integration than outsourcing.
- Lower hiring and management overhead.
- Can scale teams efficiently with vendor help.
Cons:
- Vendor owns the talent and infrastructure.
- Less influence over team culture and process.
- Hidden costs in long-term engagements.
Example:
Slack initially used an ODC model for its backend development in Canada through a third-party vendor. As the product matured, they brought development in-house to maintain quality and speed.
Best For:
Companies that need a consistent offshore team but want to avoid setting up their own infrastructure.
Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT)
In a BOT model, a vendor builds the offshore team and infrastructure, operates it for a period (typically 1–3 years), and then transfers full control and ownership to the client.
Pros:
- De-risked entry into new geographies.
- Full control after the transfer.
- Time to understand local operations before taking over.
Cons:
- Complex transition process.
- Potential misalignment of long-term goals with the vendor.
- High switching cost if transfer fails.
Example:
Western Union followed a BOT model in India, where a vendor built and ran their shared services operations before handing over the reins to Western Union’s internal teams.
Best For:
Mid-to-large firms looking for eventual ownership but want to test operations and talent first.
Global Capability Centers (GCCs)
A GCC (formerly known as a captive center) is a fully owned offshore unit that handles core business functions such as R&D, engineering, finance, HR, analytics, and even innovation.
Rather than outsourcing work, companies establish their own team and infrastructure in another country—typically India—to operate as an integrated extension of their global operations.
Pros:
- Full control over hiring, operations, and culture.
- Higher retention and alignment with business goals.
- Stronger data security and IP ownership.
- Long-term cost efficiency and institutional knowledge.
- Ability to drive innovation, not just execution.
Cons:
- Higher initial setup time and costs.
- Requires compliance with local legal and labor regulations.
- Needs local expertise to avoid missteps.
Why India?
India currently hosts over 1,580 GCCs as of 2024, employing more than 1.7 million professionals. Companies are choosing India due to:
- A deep pool of skilled, English-speaking talent.
- Cost-effective operations (up to 60% savings vs. the West).
- Thriving tech ecosystems in Tier-1 and Tier-2 cities.
- Mature legal and IT infrastructure.
Examples:
- Walmart Global Tech India supports core retail, supply chain, and product development functions for Walmart globally. It began with a small tech team and now has over 4,000+ employees in India.
- Target runs one of its largest innovation centers outside the U.S. in Bangalore, focusing on digital product development, data science, and AI.
- Goldman Sachs has built a full-fledged engineering and analytics hub in Bangalore, which contributes to its global finance operations.
Best For:
Companies committed to building long-term strategic value from their offshore operations—especially in tech, finance, e-commerce, or innovation.
Go Global, 30% Faster – Launch your GCC in India now!
Secure the best location, cut setup costs, and gain a competitive edge—before it’s too late!
Final Thoughts
Offshoring is no longer about cost-cutting—it’s about building global capacity, tapping into innovation, and creating strategic resilience.
Each model—outsourcing, freelancing, ODCs, BOT, and GCC—has its place. But if you’re planning for long-term success, want complete control, and aim to turn your offshore team into a competitive advantage, a GCC in India is your smartest move.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What’s the difference between outsourcing and building an offshore team?
Outsourcing typically involves hiring a third-party vendor to manage specific tasks or projects. Building an offshore team, on the other hand, means creating a dedicated team that works exclusively for your company, either through a partner or your own entity. Offshore teams offer more control, deeper integration, and long-term value.
Which offshore model is best for a fast-scaling startup?
For fast-growing startups, a managed or dedicated team model is often ideal. It balances speed, scalability, and control. Freelancers may work for short-term needs, but dedicated offshore teams allow for better alignment with company culture, long-term planning, and IP protection.
How do I manage communication with an offshore team across time zones?
Use a combination of asynchronous tools (Slack, Notion, Loom) and structured overlap hours for live check-ins. Establish clear processes, shared KPIs, and regular touchpoints to bridge time zone gaps and maintain productivity.
What are the legal and compliance risks with offshore hiring?
Risks can include misclassification of employees, tax complications, data security concerns, and labor law violations. Partnering with a vetted offshore provider or GCC setup firm can help mitigate these risks through local compliance support, contracts, and insurance.
Does Supersourcing help build GCCs or offshore teams?
Yes. Supersourcing offers end-to-end support for building your own Global Capability Center (GCC) or assembling a dedicated offshore team. From talent acquisition to legal setup and infrastructure, we help companies scale in India’s tier 1 and tier 2 cities with speed, transparency, and compliance.