If you’re searching “GCC vs captive vs outsourcing in India”, “best offshore model in India”, or “should we build a GCC or outsource to India”, you’re making a long-term structural decision—not a procurement choice.
This article breaks down all three models clearly, with cost, control, IP, risk, scalability, and ROI comparisons, so founders, CTOs, CFOs, and boards can choose the right model for their stage and ambition.
The Three India Operating Models (Quick Definitions)
1️⃣ Global Capability Center (GCC)
A dedicated offshore center where India owns core capabilities, either as:
-
Wholly owned subsidiary, or
-
Partner-led captive (managed but exclusive)
👉 India is an extension of your company, not a vendor.
2️⃣ Captive Center (Traditional)
An older form of GCC, fully owned and operated internally, usually:
-
Heavy on infra & admin
-
Slower to start
-
Enterprise-heavy governance
👉 High control, but often rigid and expensive.
3️⃣ Outsourcing / Vendor Model
A third-party service provider delivers work via contracts:
-
Fixed price / T&M
-
Shared talent pools
-
SLA-driven delivery
👉 Fast to start, but low ownership.
High-Level Comparison (Board Snapshot)
| Dimension | GCC (Modern) | Captive (Traditional) | Outsourcing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time to start | Fast (30–60 days) | Slow (90–180 days) | Very fast |
| IP ownership | Full | Full | ❌ Vendor |
| Cost (5-year) | Lowest | Medium–High | High |
| Scalability | Very High | Medium | Medium |
| Talent retention | High | Medium | Low |
| Control | High | Very High | Low |
| Flexibility | High | Low | Medium |
| Long-term ROI | Compounding | Moderate | Limited |
Cost Comparison (Reality, Not Marketing)
Fully Loaded Annual Cost per Engineer (USD)
| Model | Tier-1 India | Tier-2 India |
|---|---|---|
| Outsourcing | $60k–80k | $45k–65k |
| Captive | $50k–65k | $38k–50k |
| GCC (Modern) | $45k–60k | $28k–40k |
Key insight:
Outsourcing looks cheaper short-term but becomes most expensive over time due to attrition, rework, and lack of ownership.
IP, Security & Risk (This Is Where Decisions Are Made)
| Area | GCC | Captive | Outsourcing |
|---|---|---|---|
| IP ownership | Clear | Clear | ❌ Risky |
| Data control | High | Very High | Medium |
| Audit readiness | High | High | Medium |
| Knowledge retention | High | Medium | Low |
If the work touches core IP, data, or platforms, outsourcing becomes a liability.
Scalability Reality (50 → 500 → 5,000)
| Model | Scale Speed | Scale Risk |
|---|---|---|
| GCC | Fast & clean | Low |
| Captive | Slow | Medium |
| Outsourcing | Medium | High |
Why GCC wins:
You control hiring, leadership, culture, and roadmap—at scale.
When Each Model Makes Sense (Be Honest)
Choose Outsourcing if:
-
Work is non-core
-
Short-term delivery only
-
No IP sensitivity
-
Team size < 20
Choose Captive if:
-
You’re a large enterprise
-
Heavy regulatory constraints
-
Willing to invest time & overhead
(Modern GCCs often outperform captives today.)
Choose GCC (Modern) if:
-
Capability is strategic
-
You want IP ownership
-
You plan to scale beyond 50–100
-
You want predictable costs over 5–10 years
👉 This is why GCCs are the fastest-growing model in India.
Speed vs Durability (Hidden Trade-off)
| Model | Speed to Start | Durability |
|---|---|---|
| Outsourcing | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐ |
| Captive | ⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| GCC | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
The winning companies optimize for durability, not day-one speed.
Attrition & Culture Impact
| Model | Attrition Pattern |
|---|---|
| Outsourcing | 20–30% (shared talent) |
| Captive | 15–20% |
| GCC (Tier-2 cities) | 7–11% |
Retention alone can swing millions in TCO over 5 years.
Hybrid Models (What Smart Companies Do)
Many companies follow:
-
Outsourcing (experiment)
-
EOR / Pilot
-
GCC (scale & own)
Outsourcing becomes a transition step, not the end state.
Decision Framework (Use This)
Answer “yes” to any of these → GCC wins:
-
Is this core IP?
-
Will this scale past 50 people?
-
Do we want long-term cost predictability?
-
Do we need knowledge retention?
If most answers are “no” → outsourcing may suffice.
How Supersourcing Helps You Choose & Execute the Right Model
Supersourcing helps global companies move from outsourcing to ownership—without disruption.
Why companies choose Supersourcing
-
CMMI Level 5 organization
-
Google AI Accelerator Batch participant
-
LinkedIn Top 10 company recognition
-
Deep expertise in modern GCCs (not legacy captives)
-
Tier-2 India specialization for lower cost & higher retention
-
End-to-end ownership: strategy → setup → scale
They don’t push a model.
They design what fits your business stage.
Final Takeaway (For Searchers)
If you’re choosing between GCC vs captive vs outsourcing in India:
-
Outsourcing = speed, low ownership
-
Captive = control, slow start
-
GCC = best balance of speed, control, cost & ROI
For most tech-driven companies in 2026, the answer is clear:
👉 Modern GCC in India.
